Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

WHY DO THE GOSPELS CONFLICT CONCERNING WHERE JESUS WAS BORN?

Answer for yourself: Was Yeshua from Bethlehem or Nazareth?

Answer for yourself: Were you aware that the Gospels conflict with each other in this regard?

Matt 1:1-2:23

CHAPTER 2

We all heard the story before. Matthew tells us that Yeshua was born in Bethlehem. After he is born King Herod heard of the birth of this Jewish-would-be Messiah, and to get away, Joseph is warned to flee to Egypt because Herod is seeking to kill the baby. Once Herod is dead his son takes the throne (Archelaus) and the angel tells Joseph he can return to Israel (Bethlehem). Yet in verse 22 he returns to other than Bethlehem. He goes not to Judea but to Galilee. He goes to Nazareth.

Answer for yourself: Why does the writer of the Gospel of Matthew write that Joseph returns to Nazareth?

Matthew would have us believe that such a return to Nazareth is a fulfillment of prophecy.

Matthew states in chapter 2:23 that “he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that is might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene.”

Answer for yourself: Is this really a fulfillment of prophecy?

In the footnotes in your Bible the book of Judges 13:5 is given as a reference for “He shall be called a Nazarene.” If you look up the reference for yourself you will see that the original intention of the writer of the book of Judges was to prophecy of the birth of Sampson. The divinely promised child was to be a Nazarite, one separated from the world and consecrated to the Lord. Obviously the writer of the book of Matthew, who we are supposed to believe was a Jew and a follower of Yeshua, confused these two “n” words…..Nazareth a city and Nazarite a separated individual who removed from himself the use of wine and also refrained from touching a dead body or cutting his hair. The reference to Nazarite has absolutely nothing to do with a city. Again we are led astray by the writer of the Gospel of Matthew.

Answer for yourself: Can we say that the Holy Spirit anointed the writer to make such an error? Can you possibly think of any scenario whereby a Jew, if he wrote this, could possibly get this wrong?

Being called a Nazarene and being a Nazarite have nothing in common at all. Needless to say the prophets spoke of Nazarites but never prophesied that Yeshua or the Messiah were to be called Nazarenes. It is hard for me to conceive how a Jew, if he was the writer, let alone commissioned by the Holy Spirit to write, could make such a mistake in these two concepts.

There is no prophecy recorded anywhere in the Jewish Scriptures where the Messiah or Yeshua was to be called a Nazarene.

LUKE HAS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT STORY...WHY?

To Further Complicate Things We Find That Luke Paints A Completely Different And Conflicting Story

Luke 2:1-39

If we can believe Luke we find that Mary and Joseph was not living in Bethlehem as Matthew had said but in Nazareth (their home town). Mary was pregnant in Nazareth. According to Christian theology the Messiah has to be born in Bethlehem (in a previous article we saw that this is not necessarily so). But make no mistake about it Luke has Joseph and Mary living in Nazareth. Luke contrives an incredible scenario. There was a census for taxation purposes taken during the year Yeshua was a baby. We know for a fact that this census occurred in 6 A.D. yet Matthew has Yeshua being born in 4 B.C.E. in the year that Herod dies. That would make Yeshua a 10 year old "baby." Something is desperately wrong with these "inerrant and infallible passages in the New Testament."

That is another problem for another day. The rules of the census was that you have to be counted in the city you were born. This was never the Roman custom. If we think about this just for a second this is entirely off the wall and the difficulties would be enormous. Besides this the whole idea is stupid for the whole purpose of the census is to tax them where they make their money and that would be in the city in which they lived and worked (not the city of their birth). Who cares where a family came from? Besides this, there is no historical evidence that this was the custom back then.

Luke has to get Yeshua and his family from Nazareth to Bethlehem to agree with the Christian tradition that the Messiah was to come from Bethlehem. As shown in the prior article this "understanding" comes from a total lack of understanding of Micah and no Jew would make such a mistake, let alone under the anointing of G-d no less. In v 4 Luke records that Joseph goes up to Judea from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to register at the city of David, called Bethlehem, because he was of the house of David by descent, and with him went Mary who was betrothed to him. The baby is born in the right city thanks to the help of Luke. They stayed in Bethlehem until after Mary’s purification (v22) in accordance with the Law and only then did they bring Yeshua to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord. Next they returned to Nazareth.

THERE ARE SEVERAL PROBLEMS MOST HAVE NEVER NOTICED:

  1. What is their home town…..Bethlehem as Matthew says or Nazareth as Luke says?
  2. In the book of Matthew just as the baby is born they have to flee to Egypt, but Luke omits the trip to Egypt. Luke has them going from Nazareth to Bethlehem, from Bethlehem to Jerusalem, and from Jerusalem to Nazareth. There is no mention of any trip to Egypt.

What we have here is two garbled stories.

JESUS OF BETHLEHEM OR JESUS OF NAZARETH?

Answer for yourself: What is Yeshua called through out the NT?

Yeshua of Nazareth. Yeshua is never called “Yeshua of Bethlehem” which he would have been if the writer of Matthew was correct as well as if others alive at the time knew for certain he had come from Bethlehem.

There seems to be a lack of clarity about where Yeshua was from.

John 1:44-46

People who came from Galilee were looked upon in the first century stupid people. “Can any good thing come out of Galilee” was a saying common in the first century. You see the Jews knew what the Christians don’t. The Messiah can come from any city. He need not be restricted to Bethlehem. But the Messiah will come from one (David) who came from Bethlehem. So Yeshua coming from Nazareth was not meant to be a disqualification. It was only doubted that someone as important as the Messiah would come from such a common and humble beginning. Now you know the truth!

John 7:41-43

There was division among the people if Yeshua could be the messiah because he came from the wrong town. So without a doubt we see that those alive at the time knew of Yeshua's ancestry and were full aware that somewhere other than Bethlehem was know to be Yeshua's place of birth. But we would only have known that if we looked at the Gospel very closely as we have in this article. Shalom.

{short description of image}Bennoah1@verizon.net